• Home
Advertisements

the Victorian era

Did I misplace my pince-nez again? Light reading on the 19th century.

Feeds:
« Horizontal history
Sailing the world with spices and a monkey puzzle tree… »

Should you bathe more often than once a week?

August 12, 2016 by 19thcentury

With today’s hygiene standards, some people are shocked to hear that it was very common in the 19th century to only bathe once a week. But it was!

So why? Well, for a multitude of reasons. First of all, it was simply tradition. From the middle ages on, it was thought that bathing too often would make you sick or sickly, and bathing once a week was enough. Some people or some cultures started to bathe more often (an example is Marie Antoinette at Versailles, who bathed every day) but this was definitely not common practise by the 19th century. 52549420dbfa3f2cb501051a._w.309_h.316_s.fit_

Also, bathing means full-on taking a bath. Many people were spot cleaning: washing face and hands every day, and maybe their feet as well. The same thing happened to clothes, by the way. It was very common to wear the same dress all week but to switch out collars and cuffs more often.

Water had to be drawn from wells for a large part, and heated on stoves. And with families as large as in the 19th century, there really was no way they could have washed themselves or their clothes more than they did! Homes with dedicated bathrooms that resemble our modern bathrooms started appearing in the late 19th century, but homes in rural areas often didn’t have plumbed bathrooms even well into the 20th.

Eww, that’s gross, you say? Well, the notion of what is clean vs what is dirty has varied a lot across the ages, and very, very few populations ever have had the economical means to apply our standards of washing everyday and changing clothes often. Currently, we’re a very clean culture, scrubbing and using lots of detergents to get everything spotless and desinfected. The 19th century was, for a large part, really more about not appearing to be muddy.

Kusakabe_Kimbei_-_B1098_Home_Bathing

Bathing was a pretty big deal. There’s a scene in Ingalls Wilder’s Farmer Boy where Almanzo has to take a bath and he hates it very much, because he doesn’t like just sitting there and getting wet, and also it’s cold and he has to wear clean clothes that are very stiff. So it was really a different outlook back then.

Clothes were changed about once a week (these school regulations from the 19th century show that students had to bathe on Saturdays and change their clothes once a week.)

This had to do with cleanliness but also very much with the fact that clothes were very expensive in the 19th century. Basically, clothing was vastly more expensive to produce prior to the advent of mass production, which is really only possible once the sewing machine has come into use. As late as the American Civil War, the vast majority of clothing was being hand sewn, and much of it, especially coats and trousers, were tailor made. So, people generally owned far fewer sets of clothing, but they were comparatively better quality than what most of us wear today.

bathing-bathtub-dispersible-bathtub-wood-engraving-circa-1880-dismountable-BX6NFG

Definitely didn’t buy rights to this picture DX

As an historical example, Abraham Lincoln’s first proper suit of clothes (a frock coat, trousers, and a vest), made during the 1830s or 40s, cost $60. This is at a time when a private in the US Army made about $10 per month.

So, should you bathe more often than once a week? You shouldn’t if you lived in the 19th century, only maybe take some care to keep your hands and face clean. And change out your cuffs, if they get dirty. Otherwise, once a week is plenty.

 

Some academic sources for you:

  • Georges Vigarello, Le Propre et le Sale : L’hygiène du corps depuis le Moyen Âge, Paris, Éditions du Seuil, coll. « L’univers historique », 1987, 288 p. (ISBN 978-2-02-008634-9)
  • In english: Concepts of Cleanliness: Changing Attitudes in France since the Middle Ages, Cambridge University Press, 2008

 

 

 

Advertisements

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in 19th century, fashion, people | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on August 12, 2016 at 10:34 pm | Reply Ocean Bream

    Very interesting indeed. So if they smelled bad or if their pits reeked, it didn’t matter – as long as they didn’t appear grimy! I wonder if perhaps their sense of smell was different back then too, what with all the manure in the streets and their chamber pots. Also, I suppose if everybody smelled a bit nasty, they wouldn’t particularly stand out because they would all be used to the smell. Sounds weird, but it was normal!


  2. on August 13, 2016 at 12:45 am | Reply girl stuff

    I imagine that carrying and heating water for a bath back then was quite the hassle. A lot of people would also wear sachets in their clothes – a linen bag of herbs and dried flowers that smelled good. And if you were in a particular stinky part of town? you could hold the sachet up to your face for something that smelled better.


  3. on August 16, 2016 at 2:25 am | Reply Fredda Katcoff

    fascinating post



Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Advertisements
  • Top Posts

    • A Menu from the early 19th century
    • Drinking from saucers
    • Laudanum, and its many uses
    • Guest post: Women's Education in 19th century
    • Female hysteria
    • Victorian cooking: upperclass dinner (3/4)
    • Victorian cooking & kitchens (1/4)
    • Symbolism in the Victorian Era (sponsored post)
    • Coffee houses
    • Victorian cooking (2/4)
  • About me

    Hi! My name is Geerte, I'm a researcher of Nineteenth century history from the Netherlands. This blog is where I write about my favourite subject. Feel free to browse around!
  • tags

    19th century 19th century kitchens 1870s 1880s architecture art arthur rackham art nouveau austen bbc beauty beethoven bleak house book book illustrations books bustle skirt byron Caspar David Friedrich circus dickens Dickens museum dinner england fairytales fashion fashion plates fashion prints flowers fun facts gardening germany hair history horta immortal beloved japanese prints jugendstil keats laudanum lazy blogging Leighton house literature London museums lord byron louis le prince ludwig ludwig von beethoven menswear movie review movies nineteenth century opium oscar wilde pictures poetry prince puckler reading review roundhay garden sense and sensibility shelley Sir John Soane's house Tennyson the lady of shalott travel literature victorian victorian cooking victorian era victorian fashion victorian literature victorian recipes wuthering heights
  • Blog Stats

    • 1,273,780 hits
  • 19thcentury on Twitter

  • Tags

    19th century 19th century kitchens 1870s 1880s architecture art arthur rackham art nouveau austen bbc beauty beethoven bleak house book book illustrations books bustle skirt byron Caspar David Friedrich circus dickens Dickens museum dinner england fairytales fashion fashion plates fashion prints flowers fun facts gardening germany hair history horta immortal beloved japanese prints jugendstil keats laudanum lazy blogging Leighton house literature London museums lord byron louis le prince ludwig ludwig von beethoven menswear movie review movies nineteenth century opium oscar wilde pictures poetry prince puckler reading review roundhay garden sense and sensibility shelley Sir John Soane's house Tennyson the lady of shalott travel literature victorian victorian cooking victorian era victorian fashion victorian literature victorian recipes wuthering heights
  • Advertisements

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


%d bloggers like this: